The article is from Judicial Watch and is based upon information collected under the Freedom of Information Act. The page opens upon on an article about Clinton emails, but just scroll down to the article on the fetal tissue.
Blog
Is it death or is it not?
Wesley Smith is a long-time worker in the field of bioethics, especially in the battle against Euthanasia. This article is a commentary on a recent case of a declaration of death of a person whose brain was severely traumatized but she was not dead.
From the article: “An article detailing the results of examination of Jahi’s brain by another neurologist, published in the respected Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences, explains precisely why she was not really brain dead. meaning, she was not dead at all. Rather, the doctor opines that she experience a severe cognitive disability of a kind not observed heretofore.” Read it here: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/jahi-mcmath-was-not-brain-dead/.
Organ Donations-Here’s the problem
As the article says, “A person can be dead in one state and alive in another.” The fact is that the problem is greater even than that. Definitions of brain death differ from one place to another, possibly even from one hospital or physician to another. In principle, the Church supports organ donation, including donation of unpaired vital organs with one fundamental requirement, the donor must be dead. So the dead donor rule is the fundamental consideration in the morality of organ donation. St. John Paul II wrote that the neurological criteria (whole brain death) satisfied the requirement, but the concept is still debated. A great deal of paper has been used in debating this matter and some question the advice that the Pope received. I would say that the Pope’s acceptance of brain death was nuanced and that he intended quite clearly that the requirements for establishing brain death, irreversible cessation of all brain function, would be rigorously held. Some consider the concept to be too restrictive. Others are deeply critical of the idea of taking a beating heart from a person who is dead by any definition. There are very good Catholics on both sides of the debate. This is not an easy thing to sort out. Most people would find the literature to be very difficult to follow. It is important, however, that Catholics recognize the problems with the criteria for establishing death. The fact that organ donation is a generous act does not compensate for ending the life of the donor by the removal of organs.
Click here to go to a recent article on revising th so-called Uniform Definition of Death Act.
Eugenics and Vaccines
The reporting in recent issues of the Catholic World Report will trouble Catholics greatly. The reporting in the links below is an expose on the development of vaccines based upon the extraction and use of fetal tissue. The facts are horrifying. Very few people know much about the Eugenics Movement, especially in the United States. It has not been covered much by Progressive Historians because it is part of the legacy of the Progressive Movement. It is a horror show. Margaret Sanger was a Progressive and a Eugenicist. Little wonder there is a connection now running from Eugenics, to abortion, to vaccines, and possibly even to the COVID 19 Vaccine.
Exploring the dark world of vaccines and fetal tissue research: Part 1
Exploring the dark world of vaccines and fetal tissue research: Part 2
COVID 19 Vaccine Resources
Damaging Lives in the Strange World of Gender Reassignment
Former Director of the Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatrist-in-Chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital:
“I’m amazed at the amount of power and weaponry that it’s gotten behind it now, with the government and law and even medical organizations getting behind it, but I’m absolutely convinced that this is folly and it’s going to collapse, just as the eugenics folly collapsed. Eugenics was quite as powerful, after all.” Dr. Paul McHugh
