“The WHO reports include recommendations on the governance and oversight of human genome editing in nine discrete areas, including human genome editing registries; international research and medical travel; illegal, unregistered, unethical or unsafe research; intellectual property; and education, engagement and empowerment. The recommendations focus on systems-level improvements needed to build capacity in all countries to ensure that human genome editing is used safely, effectively, and ethically.”
Potentially, genetic therapy could be morally acceptable. What caught my attention, however, is that the Chinese government, which seems to control the WHO, have already done some of this. Is it a coincidence that the COVID-19 Vaccines are genetically-engineered? I am not being a conspiracy theorist. The whole scenario does strike one as something requiring vigilance.
Front Line Moral 
Thank you for sharing this important information.
LikeLike
So it could be morally acceptable to have gene therapy, MRNA, injected. My understanding is that it can alter your DNA. According to the Supreme Court, people would then be classified as trans human. Not sure what that entails, but it sounds ominous.
LikeLike
Gene therapy could be morally acceptable, in principle, if it addresses a pathology. A eugenic use is not moral. The whole question will become more front-and-center as these therapies develop and as the push for trans-humanism continues by the likes of Klaus Schwab and others in the Davos Group. The means of delivery would also have to be safe. Of course, this is all very much in the future. I mentioned the MRNA vaccine only because of concerns over its safety and the support given by WHO to gene therapy.
LikeLike